Categories
|

2023 Taiwan Industrial Net Zero Policy Recommendations

Last year, Taiwan’s National Development Council published the “Taiwan’s Pathway to Net-zero Emissions by 2050” and “12 Key Strategies” to respond the trends of 2050 net-zero goals that have been committed by many economies in the world. Based on the targets and strategies, Taiwan’s Industrial Development Bureau also proposed “Net-zero Transition Pathway of Industrial Sector by 2030” to further explain its short- and medium-term plans to drive industrial decarbonization.

It is true that the Taiwanese government has made some progress regarding climate policy planning, but it is not sufficient to ensure that Taiwan meets the climate pledges. The biggest problem may be that the “12 Key Strategies” do not have a coherent action plan to decarbonize industrial sector nor innovative policy tools to encourage hard-to-abate industries to adopt low-carbon technologies — despite they produce around 40% of the country’s emissions. Instead of an ambitious industrial plan, measures to cut emissions in industries are scattered across 12 strategies on hydrogen, energy efficiency, carbon capture and other areas. In view of this, Taiwan Climate Action Network (TCAN) advocates that Taiwan’s net-zero strategies should be “12+1,” i.e. the Industrial Development Bureau should come up with an integrated industrial decarbonization plan based on the existing 12 key strategies. Moreover, relevant policy instruments should be innovated, and the policy process needs to be more inclusive and transparent. To provide comprehensive suggestions and call for more stakeholders’ participation, TCAN published the policy report: Key Policy Mixes for a Net-Zero industry in Taiwan.

In this policy report, TCAN pointed out many areas that should be improved in current industrial policy, furthermore, we introduced three policy tools that play crucial roles to decarbonize hard-to-abate industries as well. In chapter 2, we reviewed critical international research and experience, examined Taiwanese government’s documents related to the measures of industrial GHG reduction, and then provided key recommendations for the authority, including the establishment of interim targets (milestones), strengthening of climate laws and regulations, and supporting mechanism for industrial net-zero transition. In chapter 3, we highlight three policy tools that can accelerate GHG reduction in industrial sector, including demand-side mechanism: “green public procurement (low carbon procurement) for public construction projects,” supply-side mechanism: “carbon contracts for difference (CCfD)” and information-based tool: “tracking major enterprises’/ products’ climate performance (climate disclosure improvement).” Here we not only presented the policy rationale but also emphasized the implications for Taiwan.

A comprehensive industrial net-zero policy covers a variety of fields, and this policy brief just dealt with some topics. To develop an effective and inclusive industrial low-carbon transition strategy, it is necessary to invite more stakeholders to participate policy planning, implementation, and evaluation. Therefore, in the policy brief, TCAN also suggest that the authorities shall establish a unified long-term communication mechanism during the policy process by adhering to three principles: “disclosures of policy progress,” “civil society engagement,” and “concrete response to the opinions of stakeholders,” otherwise, it will be difficult to have people’s support toward to Net-zero target.

臺灣工業淨零政策建議書

臺灣工業淨零政策建議書.pdf – 3.02 MB

Download File

Related Posts

Categories

(Taiwan Insight)With its threats to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement and its “energy dominance” agenda, the return of the Trump administration is set to disrupt the global energy landscape. This marks a sharp contrast to the climate legacy of the Biden administration, characterised by historic investments, governance innovation, and renewed international leadership. The Biden administration has implemented a comprehensive approach to address climate change through legislation, policy coordination, and international leadership. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), passed in 2022, allocates $370 billion in federal incentives, the largest climate-focused investment globally. The IRA mandates that 40% of the funds benefit disadvantaged communities and enforces strict environmental standards for hydrogen projects. To ensure effective implementation, the Biden administration established the National Climate Task Force, adopting a whole-of-government approach to domestic climate policy coordination. Therefore, climate change is listed as a key pillar of the National Security Strategy and Trade Policy Agenda. The Department of Treasury, for example, proposed the first Climate Action Plan in 2021. In addition to the federal level, the local climate actions were also strengthened by providing grants to support each state, Metropolitan Statistical Area, Tribe, and territories to develop priority climate plans. Internationally, Biden restored US leadership in climate negotiations, convening the Leaders’ Summit on Climate in 2021 and fostering global initiatives such as the Global Methane Pledge and the Green Shipping Challenge. Collaborations like the First Movers Coalition also mobilised private-sector support for green technologies like steel and concrete. Within the formal UN COP process, the US also played a constructive role in formalising the “loss and damage fund” and “transition away from fossil fuel” in the negotiation texts. This progress made in addressing climate change, however, faces significant challenges as Trump prepares to take office in January. The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a comprehensive 900-page policy blueprint for the next Republican administration, recommends scaling back environmental regulations, expediting fossil fuel project permits, and halting clean energy subsidies. According to Energy Innovation, implementing Project 2025 could increase US greenhouse gas emissions by 27% by 2030, adding 0.04°C of warming by 2100. Trump’s appointees for key climate and energy positions signal a dramatic policy shift. Former North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum is nominated to lead the Interior Department and chair the newly established National Energy Council, tasked with dismantling the achievements of the National Climate Task Force. Chris Wright, CEO of Liberty Energy, is poised to become Secretary of Energy, while former Congressman Lee Zeldin is tapped to lead the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Zeldin, an outspoken advocate for energy dominance, emphasised the importance of gasoline vehicles during his nomination announcement. Domestically, Trump has pledged to halve energy and electricity prices within 18 months, aiming to achieve this by ramping up fossil fuel production on federal lands and removing utility regulations. However, experts warn that these goals are unrealistic, given the interconnected nature of global oil markets. Internationally, Trump plans to withdraw the US from the Paris Climate Agreement once again, potentially by 2026. This retreat would weaken global climate cooperation, particularly by reducing the US’s $11 billion climate finance commitment, limiting other countries’ ability to propose ambitious climate plans necessary for closing the emissions gap. For Taiwan, climate change and energy transition have played a growing role in its partnership with the US over the past four years. The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) has supported climate expos and forums, while the 2024 Global Cooperation and Training Framework (GCTF) focused on the net-zero transition. Moreover, the U.S.-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade includes a dedicated chapter on environmental and climate issues. Another symbolic climate moment was when President Tsai announced Taiwan should commit to Net-Zero by 2050 at a forum supported by AIT. However, starting in 2025, climate change may no longer serve as a shared priority between the US and Taiwan, creating new challenges for Taiwan’s international climate engagement. To adapt to this shifting landscape, Taiwan must conduct a strategic analysis to mitigate risks and capitalise on emerging opportunities. One key issue for analysis is the geopolitical impact of climate change. Over the past four years, U.S.-China cooperation has been crucial for advancing global climate negotiations. If the US steps back, the EU and UK may collaborate with China to stabilise the global climate regime. However, China has previously used climate negotiations as leverage in geopolitical disputes, such as suspending climate talks with the US following Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan. Taiwan must account for these risks when engaging with EU and UK leadership. Another critical issue is Taiwan’s energy relationship with the US. Currently, the US supplies 10% of Taiwan’s liquefied natural gas (LNG). While the Biden administration temporarily paused LNG terminal expansions in early 2023, the Trump administration is likely to promote increased LNG exports. This raises concerns about the “lock-in effect,” where expanded LNG infrastructure could hinder decarbonisation efforts after 2035. To address this, Taiwan should establish a clear roadmap for LNG use that balances energy security with long-term climate goals. In terms of trade, electric vehicles (EVs) and battery storage have been focal points of U.S.-Taiwan cooperation under Biden. While “energy transition” prioritises shifting away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy sources to achieve decarbonisation, “energy innovation” emphasises advancing technologies to enhance energy production and efficiency, regardless of the energy source. Under Trump, “energy transition” may lose prominence at the federal level, but “energy innovation” will likely remain a priority of their energy dominance agenda. Advanced geothermal energy, for instance, could attract significant investment. Taiwan has recently announced an ambitious target of over 3 GW of geothermal energy by 2030. By expanding its geothermal strategy, Taiwan could strengthen energy trade with the US, balancing economic ties while advancing decarbonisation goals. In conclusion, Trump’s return to the presidency could reshape the global energy landscape, challenging Taiwan to navigate a more uncertain climate policy environment. By proactively addressing geopolitical risks, energy flows, and trade opportunities, Taiwan can safeguard its climate ambitions while maintaining robust ties with the US. Dr Chia-wei Chao is the Research Director of Taiwan Climate Action Network (TCAN) and an Adjunct Assistant Professor at National Taiwan University’s Program in Climate Change and Sustainable Development.